Employment · Template
The internship is the engagement most likely to be run on a WhatsApp message, and the one most likely to produce a surprise later: an intern who turns out to own the code they wrote, or a company that assumed the POSH Act did not reach them. The Act names interns expressly.
Generate this document See all 30 templatesYes, expressly. The definition of "employee" in s. 2(f) of the POSH Act, 2013 includes a person engaged as an intern or probationer, with or without remuneration. Your policy, your Internal Committee and your complaint process all extend to them from day one.
It depends on whether the relationship is in substance employment and on each scheme’s own applicability tests. A genuine fixed-term learning engagement paid a stipend is treated differently from employment, but the label on the document is not what decides it. Confirm the position for your establishment with whoever runs your payroll rather than assuming the word "intern" settles it.
Not by itself, but conduct can create an expectation — an intern kept on indefinitely, given employee duties and reviewed like an employee is not obviously an intern any more. If you do not intend an offer to follow, say so in the agreement and keep the engagement genuinely time-bound.
No. An apprenticeship under the Apprentices Act, 1961 is a registered contract with statutory training and stipend obligations attached. An internship is an ordinary contractual engagement. Documenting one as the other creates obligations you did not plan for, or forfeits protections you thought you had.