Section 12, DPDP Act 2023 — Right to Correction, Completion and Erasure
A Data Principal may require personal data to be corrected, completed, updated or erased, and erasure can only be refused where retention is required by law. (Section 12, Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023.)
Quick Statutory Answer
Under Section 12 of the DPDP Act 2023, Data Principals possess the statutory right to request correction of inaccurate data, completion of incomplete records, updating of stale data, and full erasure of personal data that is no longer required for the purpose for which consent was given. Data Fiduciaries must honour erasure requests across all production databases and third-party processors unless statutory record-retention laws (such as tax or company law) require continued preservation.
A Data Principal has the right to correction, completion, updating and erasure of her personal data, for processing to which she has previously given consent.
On receiving a request, the Data Fiduciary must correct inaccurate or misleading personal data, complete data that is incomplete, and update data that is out of date.
On a request for erasure, the Data Fiduciary must erase personal data across all systems unless retention is necessary for the specified purpose or for compliance with any law in force.
The right operates directly against the Data Fiduciary holding the data, requiring systematic tracking across databases, backups, and downstream Data Processors.
Section 12 DPDP Act: Data Principal Rights vs Statutory Retention Exceptions
Section 12 DPDP Act: Data Principal Rights vs Statutory Retention Exceptions
Data Principal Right
Statutory Scope (s.12)
Fiduciary Action Required
Lawful Retention Exception
Right to Correction
Inaccurate or misleading data
Prompt correction across all records & processors
None (must correct inaccurate data)
Right to Completion
Incomplete personal records
Update record with verified supplemental details
None (must maintain accurate records)
Right to Updating
Outdated contact or personal info
Refresh active system records
None (must update records)
Right to Erasure
Data no longer required for purpose
Complete permanent deletion / anonymisation
Statutory retention (e.g. 8-yr tax audit rule)
On refusing a valid request
Breach of Section 12. Retention must be justified by an express legal requirement or active purpose; general internal preference is not an exemption.
Where people go wrong
Refusing erasure because data might be commercially useful later. Section 12 requires deletion once original purpose ends.
Correcting records in the CRM but leaving stale data in billing or email automation databases.
Demanding excessive notarised proofs before processing simple correction requests.
Common questions
Can an individual demand erasure of their personal data under the DPDP Act?
Yes. Section 12 gives individuals the right to request erasure of their personal data, and the Data Fiduciary must delete it unless retention is mandated by another Indian law.
What is the difference between Section 12 erasure and Section 8 erasure?
Section 12 erasure is triggered upon a specific request by the individual, whereas Section 8 mandates automatic erasure by the business once consent is withdrawn or purpose concludes, even without a formal request.
Maintains the law explainers, calculators, templates and blog posts on vidhisar.in: checks them against the statute text and updates them when the law changes. Errors and changes in the law can be reported to legal@vidhisar.in.
A plain-English summary of what this provision requires, not a reproduction of it and not legal advice. Read alongside the bare Act, and take advice on anything turning on your own facts.